For the Toronto movie chain and even some outside of it, this couldn’t be further from the truth. A petition in change. org soliciting the help of Councillor Gord Perks, MP Bhutila Karpoche, Mayor Olivia Chow, MP Arif Virani and “All Elected Officials Who Care About Toronto” has already garnered more than 20,000 signatures and has been supported through the Academy. Award-winning filmmaker Guillermo Del Toro, who has worked in Toronto several times and is a well-known patron of the arts.
Priestly also “strongly disagreed” with the Mullins’ claim that Film Society Review had violated previous lease agreements, stating that although the construction did not belong to them and therefore did not belong to them, they did. in any case by the intelligence of the institution.
“We’ve spent over a million dollars necessarily improving someone else’s build over the last 17 years to deliver the experience,” Priestly told IndieWire. “We renovated the lobby, we renovated the theater, we installed new virtual projectors, we have new ticket sales formulas. We have made improvements to the cables. We replaced a plumbing formula that is over a hundred years old. We think we have done a tremendous job on the cinema.
However, according to Priestly, making money has literally been no problem. Many of his projections are sold out and none of the existing disruptions are due to the inability to pay rent. He added that while the Mullins think they could simply take over and the staff would remain, he believes that is not the case. Even parts like the light bulbs deserve to be thrown away, since they do not belong to their owners.
“Actually, the reason we sell our products is not just because we are in a prime location in a great part of Toronto. We sell ourselves through the paintings of our people, the intellectual assets and the social networks we have built. And none of this would be transferred to a new owner. They would have to start from scratch,” Priestly said. Discussing the appeal the Revue Film Society has developed around theatre, he added: “When you live in a big city like Toronto or Los Angeles and it’s very expensive and it can be very inconvenient and there are a lot of downsides to why do it. I need to live in one of those places, but one of the reasons you would need to live in one of those cities is because of things like the Revue.
“They told us very explicitly that the explanation they chose their location in front of the Revue is because it’s in front of the Revue,” Priestly told IndieWire. There is enormous synergy between our clientele, between our clients and our sponsors. So we collaborate a lot with them to produce special programs. » It turns out that if Revue Cinema and Revue Film Society did something wrong, it’s that they were also successful. In fact, it is a success that others must now intervene. Although the long-term future of Revue Cinema remains uncertain, in the short term they will continue to do what they do best: introduce other people to cinema and attract other people. together. However, with legal prices on the rise and potentially demanding long-term situations, donations are incredibly appreciated and can be made directly through their website.