Small businesses are the backbone of the American economy, employing nearly 60% of workers and contributing almost 40% to the nation’s value-added output. Accounting for 34,752,434 companies, 99.9% of all American companies are small businesses. However, micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in the U.S. are only half as productive as large companies, a stark contrast to the 60% productivity ratio seen in other advanced economies, according to research by my colleagues at the McKinsey Global Institute. This gap in productivity is equivalent to 5.4% of GDP, making it crucial to boost U.S. competitiveness in a shifting global market.
Sectoral diversification in small productivity
The productivity of American small businesses varies widely among other sectors. Although American SMMEs are on par with those in the United Kingdom, Japan, Germany and Italy in many areas, they lag particularly in mining, transportation and warehousing, as well as administration. The productivity ratio of MSMEs compared to giant companies also varies by sector. , with the mining sector facing the largest gap, followed by the generation and manufacturing of data and communications. On the contrary, white-collar MSMEs are almost as productive as their giant counterparts.
Regional disparities in MSME performance
The functionality and economic contribution of MSMEs also vary particularly between states and metropolitan spaces, MGI found. Northeastern states tend to have the highest contributions to employment and business profits, while southern states have the lowest. Among the top 40 employment-wise metropolitan areas, small businesses account for 25 to 50 percent of profits and 50 to 70 percent of business sector employment. Local economic situations influence the productivity of all companies, regardless of their size.
What explains the gap?
The productivity gap can be attributed in part to the nature of the jobs performed by small and giant firms. Large corporations concentrate on their core competencies and outsource less core activities to smaller corporations, leading to a concentration of higher value-added activities in giant corporations. However, the main reason is the disparity in access to key capabilities such as technology, human capital, access to markets and finance. For example, only a small portion of MSMEs are adopting technologies such as visitor appointment control systems and synthetic intelligence compared to giant companies. Large corporations are twice as likely to offer formal education systems and are more active in tracking functionality and awarding bonuses. MSMEs get only 5% of their total sales from direct exports, or a third of sales made abroad through giant corporations. Large companies are also 1. 5 times more likely to turn to banks to finance their capital.
The case for collaboration
To drive greater growth, both large and small businesses should explore mutually beneficial relationships. Creating the right economic conditions can help both thrive, particularly given that all large companies were small at one point. Large companies can assist smaller ones in acquiring necessary competencies, while small companies can serve as customers, suppliers, and sources of innovation for larger firms. This symbiotic relationship can boost overall productivity in most sectors.
Services that improve productivity
Large corporations can offer products and facilities that exceed the power of small businesses. Software-as-a-service providers help MSMEs automate back-end operations, reducing manual responsibilities for compliance, tax, and accounting. Large HR solution providers have created chat-based programs for payroll control and other equipment for recruitment, onboarding, and assignment control. These collaborations give small businesses access to complex technologies and capabilities, driving expansion and revenue.
Supply Chain Partnerships
Collaborative relationships in the chain of origin obtain advantages for both parties. Large corporations gain resilience and flexibility, while MSMEs expand their knowledge, human capital and market. Toyota, for example, has worked with its suppliers for more than 30 years, imparting wisdom on call planning, charge relief and management. IBM’s Supplier Connection initiative connects small suppliers with giant companies, offering them new opportunities. Studies show that 70% of small businesses in New York increase their profits within two years of joining a corporate services base. Large corporations can also demand better monetary terms from smaller suppliers, as demonstrated by DuPont’s efforts in Colombia.
Dynamic clusters
Regional networks of giant and small corporations, such as those in Silicon Valley, California, or Grand Rapids, Michigan, foster mutual growth. Small businesses gain advantages from the concentration of capital and talent, while giant corporations gain advantages from innovation and entrepreneurship. of small businesses. The Sacramento Agricultural Technology Cluster, for example, builds on the region’s strengths in agriculture and technology. Startups like Scout gain advantages from the local ecosystem of studios and experience labs. AgStart, a non-profit organization, supplies laboratory apparatus and incubation services, helping more than 20 startups. Small businesses also gain monetary advantages through acquisitions, venture capital, and government grants.
Sectoral infrastructure
Enhancing digital data and financial infrastructure can significantly boost productivity. An open data framework can help financial institutions use nontraditional data sources for credit underwriting, benefiting underfinanced MSMEs. For instance, including utility data increased loan approval rates for 20% of customers with limited credit history. Policy makers can promote technology adoption, as seen in Singapore’s GoBusiness initiative, which provides financial support for businesses adopting tech solutions. Establishing a training ecosystem, such as the U.S. Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), can help MSMEs access technical and strategic expertise. MEP has interacted with over 36,000 small manufacturers, creating or retaining more than 100,000 jobs and generating significant economic returns.
Greater collaboration among MSMEs can improve productivity through knowledge sharing, mentoring and collective investment. By fostering those relationships, companies can create a more resilient and cutting-edge economy. For example, small structural businesses can gain advantages from shared resources and expertise for their productivity, especially in the context of shortage of hard labor and increased demand for structural facilities due to increasing demand for infrastructure and energy projects. renewable.
Closing the productivity gap between small and giant businesses in the U. S. is key to boosting the country’s economic competitiveness. By strengthening networks and interactions, companies giant and small can prosper. Strong local ecosystems and network effects are especially critical for minority-owned businesses, as my colleagues’ studies of Latino-owned small businesses demonstrate. Large corporations can contribute very significant amounts in terms of technology, human capital, market access and financing, while small corporations can contribute to innovation and flexibility. Successful collaboration models will offer valuable classes and opportunities for mutual growth.
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our network aims to connect others through open and thoughtful conversations. We need our readers to share their perspectives and exchange ideas and facts in one space.
To do this, please comply with the posting regulations in our site’s terms of use. Below we summarize some of those key regulations. In short, civilized.
Your message will be rejected if we notice that it appears to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So how can you be a user?
Thank you for reading our Community Guidelines. Please read the full list of posting regulations discovered in our site’s Terms of Use.